When you use services such as Facebook or Google, do you properly read their terms of service and privacy policies?
I do not. Well, I read Facebook’s and Google’s, but almost none of the others. You go there because you want the service; nobody can realistically read terms dozens of pages long.
Providers surely know customers do not read them, so whether such consent is meaningful is highly questionable.
This situation is unfortunate for providers and users alike.
One response is the Kantara InitiativeAdditional explanatory information.Information Sharing Work GroupAdditional explanatory information.Standard Information Sharing Label called the Standard Information Sharing Label. Like a food-ingredient label, it seeks to show in a standardized format what is shared, how, and for what purpose.
The American Nutrition Facts Label looks like this.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrition_facts_label
This lets you see at a glance, for example, that it contains 12 grams. The Standard Information Sharing Label presents information similarly.
Standard Information Sharing Label
| Recipient | Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/) |
|---|---|
| Information collected | Status update [View the actual information] |
| Source | Status update [ |
| Time of collection | When the Post button is pressed |
| Purposes of use | 1To share your status with friends.2To display advertising customized for you. |
| Retention period | Until all original data and shares are deleted |
| Recipients of disclosure | Your and your friends’ timelines, and applications authorized for read_stream that use Facebook’s OpenGraph API. |
| Additional terms | |
| Underlying agreement | April 26, 2011 dated https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms |
| Third-party rating | Rating Company 4.3/5 (2011/11/4) |
| Changes to terms | Changed after 7 days’ notice, with limited exceptions |
SourceJoe Andrew “Standard Information Sharing Label”; translated and adapted for this site from
This may still be difficult, but it is far better than reading a lengthy contract.
They hope to make the design cooler. A Kickstarter fundraiser to hire a designer was cancelled after raising only about ¥500,000 . Are any designers willing to create the Japanese version pro bono?
Anyone may join the Kantara Initiative Information Sharing WG doing the actual work. Interested readers may wish to participate.
Applying It in Practice
Let us apply it to an example company.
Standard Information Sharing Label
| Recipient | Example Corporation |
|---|---|
| Information collected |
View the actual information |
| Source |
|
| Time of collection |
|
| Purposes of use |
|
| Retention period | Purposes of use5 described above. |
| Recipients of disclosure |
Purposes of use |
| Additional terms | |
| Underlying agreement | October 1, 2011 dated http://www.example.com/member/agreement/ |
| Third-party rating | Rating Company 4.3/5 (2011/11/4) |
| Changes to terms | 1The revised terms are announced on our website with at least |
This is easier than reading the contract, and it exposes problems. I would hesitate to consent for roughly the following reasons.
- Recipients of disclosureRecipients of disclosure2012/6/20Additional explanatory information.134 brands and 46,548 stores appear to accept it.
- Recipients of disclosureThe joint users are all point-program participants. Although I understand raw data is not actually shared before k-anonymization, the terms permit it. A standard label should name major companies and the total count. As of
- Too much information is disclosedAll information may be shared. Behavior across companies may be tracked and used to build and share an unwanted lifestyle profile. Multiple cards might control this, but it is unclear; explicit disclosure would be reassuring.
- Changes to termsChanges to terms1 days, notice is only on a website I probably will not visit, and revised terms apply automatically. Google permits changes at any time but requires explicit consent for detrimental changes.
- Retention periodAlthough limited to inquiries, data appears never to be deleted. A deadline is appropriate; credit bureaus, for example, use periods such as 18 months.
The Google Example
; translated and adapted for this site from
Standard Information Sharing Label
| Recipient | Google Inc. |
|---|---|
| Information collected |
|
| Source |
|
| Time of collection |
|
| Purposes of use |
|
| Retention period | Until you delete it, at no charge, except where deletion requires excessive technical effort, threatens another person’s privacy, or is extremely impractical, such as backup-tape requests. |
| Recipients of disclosure |
|
| Additional terms |
|
| Underlying agreement | October 1, 2011 dated http://www.example.com/member/agreement/ |
| Third-party rating | Rating Company 4.3/5 (2011/11/4) |
| Changes to terms | At any time, except that changes reducing your rights will not be made without your consent. |
What do you think? The original is already clear, but easier side-by-side comparison is valuable.
Future Issues
Applying the label exposes further issues. Google’s “as-if-owner” clause is in its terms, not privacy policy, and is invisible here. It lets Google act much like an owner of uploaded content. To quote:
Some Services allow users to submit content. You retain ownership of intellectual-property rights in that content; what belongs to you remains yours.
When you upload or otherwise submit content, you give Google and its partners a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works, communicate, publish, perform, publicly display, and distribute it. These rights are limited to operating, promoting, and improving the Services and developing new ones. The license continues even after you stop using the Services. Some Services let you access and delete submitted content or limit Google’s use. Ensure that you have the rights needed to grant this license.
Related posts

Meaningful Consent, Part 2: Crowdsourced Evaluation of Terms of Service—The ToS-DR Project
In an earlier article, “Meaningful Consent and the Standard Information Sharing Label,” I explained that it is unrealistic to assume users read, understand, and consent to…

So, Let’s Get a Japan Post “Digital Address”!
How to Obtain a Digital Address To obtain a digital address, first visit the post office's Digital Address website. Judging from this, it does not seem…

I Received an International Standards Development Award for ISO/IEC 29184: Online Privacy Notices and Consent
ISO/IEC 29184:2020 Information technology — Online privacy notices and consent (Japanese title: Online Privacy Notices and Consent). I received an International Standards Development Award for my…
