Let's say for the sake of argument that the US attack on Iraq was for the purpose of US self-defense.
At that stage, Japan had not been attacked by Iraq.
Since there is no attack at this stage, sending troops to Iraq in this case is
This would be an exercise of the right of collective self-defense. However, the current administration has
It seems they didn't approve of the use of it...
Without giving in, if we look at Iraq objectively, it is a temporary measure for the United States.
Since there was no threat, this would have been a war of aggression.
Sending troops to aid in this war of aggression is not only a violation of the Constitution,
It would be a violation of international law.